But what one finds is, if one asks enough Same kind of argumentation for the FSM as one can for tGotB, show that Satire of the God of the Bible, and in showing that one can muster the The idea here is that the FSM is supposed to be an obviously false Pastafarians or approximations thereof always leads you back to a clear What is the FSM's relationship to the laws of logic and of mathematics?ĭoes the impossibility of the contrary exist for Pastafarianism? If so, what is your defeater for Christianity? How is the FSM sufficient as a foundation for all reason and intelligibility? Pastafarians' fault for positing a 'god' composed of matter.) To infinity? (This is, of course, the exact same argument one uses inĪrguing against the past eternality of the universe itself. How does it solve the problem of past infinite regress, where if matterĪnd time have always existed (meaning that an infinite number of secondsĬontinuing to exist into the future means that we are continually adding How does limited matter contain it? If you answer that "it has infiniteĮnergy", why does that sound suspiciously like the God of the Bible? How does it escape the problem of entropy? Whence does it derive itsĮnergy? How is it that all its energy was not used up an infiniteĪmount of time ago? If it has infinite energy, how do you know that and If the FSM is supposed to be eternal and since it is composed of matter, Since the FSM's nature is not timeless, how does it solve the problem of entropy or infinite regress? The creation of space in which to exist? How does matter, specificallyĪ delicious Italian meal, exist without space to occupy? The FSM is supposedly made of.spaghetti and meatballs. How does the FSM account for the origin of the universe? The reliability of one's senses, as there is for the Flying SpaghettiĬhallenges for the Pastafarian to answer: Thinker) that there's as much evidence for evidence, or other minds, or Little does he realise (since he's not a particularly deep Much evidence for a designer as there is for the Flying Spaghetti
The guy is completely in over his head when he You should know that Dick Dawk cites this argument all the time, and You until you own up to what you actually believe (everyone knows youįSM), since I'm not interested in discussing stupid fairy tales. If you can't or are unwilling, I have nothing more to say to You've been linked to this page, you need to answer ALL of theseĬhallenges in order for your claim to believe in the FSM to be taken So here are some principal rebuttals to the existence of the FSM. Invisible pink unicorn would 'explain' it as well as the Christian God,īut all that shows is that simply putting forward a content freeĮxplanation (and one in itself that would also require an explanation)įor the sake of having one is not always better than admitting Philosophical question that a valid world view should be able to handle. Point you have to explain why the universe is here. I presuppose the existence of the FSM?" or "I believe the FSM is theĭesigner!" Here's a recent example, even: Presuppositional argument (ie, the TAG) I usually use in arguing for the justification of presupposing God's existence.Īn interaction in which the FSM is mentioned usually includes "Why can't However, it also has applicability to the sort of Slightly-hungover days, and I believe it because he touched me with his That this Flying Spaghetti Monster created the world in 4 With a lame attempt at wit) on the Intelligent Design's "unknownĭesigner" to the tune of "You believe God is the designer, but I think The FSM is basically a sort of spoof (sprinkled You can see some background here at the FSM's official website. I've been meaning to write up a little something on the Flying Spaghetti
0 kommentar(er)
